e-Veritas Archive | August, 2016

Study Finds Shark Fins and Meat Contain Neurotoxins Linked to Alzheimer’s

UM research team says restricting shark consumption protects human health and shark populations

Researchers detected cyanobacterial neurotoxin β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) and mercury in sharks from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

Researchers detected cyanobacterial neurotoxin β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) and mercury in sharks from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

MIAMI—In a new study, University of Miami scientists found high concentrations of toxins linked to neurodegenerative diseases in the fins and muscles of 10 species of sharks. The research team suggests that restricting consumption of sharks can have positive health benefits for consumers and for shark conservation, since several of the sharks analyzed in the study are threatened with extinction due to overfishing.

Fins and muscle tissue samples were collected from 10 shark species found in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans for concentrations of two toxins—mercury and β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA). “Recent studies have linked BMAA to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),” said Deborah Mash, professor of neurology at the Miller School of Medicine and senior author of the study.

Researchers at the  Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science and the Miller School detected concentrations of mercury and BMAA in the fins and muscles of all shark species at levels that may pose a threat to human health. While both mercury and BMAA by themselves pose a health risk, together they may also have synergistic toxic impacts.

“Since sharks are predators, living higher up in the food web, their tissues tend to accumulate and concentrate toxins, which may not only pose a threat to shark health, but also put human consumers of shark parts at a health risk,” said the study’s lead author Neil Hammerschlag, research assistant professor at the Rosenstiel School and Abess Center for Ecosystem Science and Policy.

Shark products, including shark fins, cartilage, and meat, are widely consumed in Asia and in Asian communities globally as a delicacy and as a source of traditional Chinese medicine. In addition, dietary supplements containing shark cartilage are consumed globally.

Recently scientists found BMAA in shark fins and shark cartilage supplements. The neurotoxic methyl mercury has been known to bioaccumulate in sharks over their long lifespans.

About 16 percent of the world’s shark species are threatened with extinction. The shark species sampled in this study range in threat status from least concern (bonnethead shark) to endangered (great hammerhead) by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

“Our results suggest that humans who consume shark parts may be at a risk for developing neurological diseases,” Mash said.

“People should be aware and consider restricting consumption of shark parts,” Hammerschlag said.   “Limiting the consumption of shark parts will have positive health benefits for consumers and positive conservation outcomes for sharks, many of which are threatened with extinction due in part to the growing high demand for shark fin soup and, to a lesser extent, for shark meat and cartilage products.”

The study, titled “Cyanobacterial Neurotoxin BMAA and Mercury in Sharks,” was published August  16 in the journal Toxins. IN addition to Mash and Hammerschlag, the study coauthors include David A. Davis, Kiyo Mondo, and Matthew S. Seely, from the Miller School’s Department of Neurology; Susan J. Murch and William Broc Glover from the University of British Columbia; and Timothy Divoll and David C. Evers from the Biodiversity Research Institute in Maine. The Herbert W. Hoover Foundation provided the funding for this study.

Posted in NewsComments Off

UM Weaves Many Cultural Threads into a Fabric of Belonging

By Meredith Camel, M.F.A. ’12
UM News

CultureofBelongingCORAL GABLES, Fla. (August 19, 2016) — The University of Miami has all the components of a vibrant cultural tapestry—its location in the “Gateway to the Americas,” a diverse student body hailing from 50 states and 124 foreign countries, 25-plus multicultural student groups on campus, and a No. 12 national ranking in The Princeton Review 2017 for “Lots of Race/Class Interaction.”

But metrics don’t measure whether different groups of people feel connected to each other and to the UM community. Like many other schools across the nation, the University is weaving new patterns of engagement among all identities—ensuring that a true sense of belonging is firmly threaded into its fabric.

“Diversity is the whole reason I came to the University of Miami,” said Johann A. Ali, who left his home in Trinidad in 1992 at the age of 16 to enroll at the U. He now serves on the Iron Arrow Honor Society’s Council of Elders and credits the warm welcome he received as a freshman for nurturing his lifelong connection to his alma mater. “The very notion of being able to meet so many people from all over the world was an opportunity I was hard-pressed to not pass up!”

The ways in which different groups engage with each other is a hot topic today, amid a backdrop of identity-based violence in our nation and around the world. UM President Julio Frenk—who received Yale University’s Bouchet Leadership Award Medal in April for his commitment to diversifying higher education—is firm about UM’s responsibility to serve as an “exemplary” model to society at large.

“In our turbulent times, universities must lead the way in intentionally cultivating the free expression of diverse perspectives,” Frenk said in his Bouchet keynote speech. “If we are not deliberate about creating the conditions that will encourage real bridging, we are left with multiplicity rather than real diversity.”

Feeling Valued, Adding Value

In the Roadmap to Our New Century—a proposed plan of aspirations for the University to achieve by the time it reaches its centennial in 2025—is the call for a “culture of belonging,” defined as “a campus where all members of the community feel valued and have an opportunity to add value.”

Gail Cole-Avent, executive director for student life and assessment in the Division of Student Affairs, served on the Culture of Belonging Working Group, which issued recommendations open for feedback from the UM community at president.miami.edu/roadmap. A series of town hall meetings this September will encourage further conversation about all eight of the draft Roadmap Initiatives as they become final plans for action.

“We had the task of figuring out how to help each individual feel part of the community based off of their definition, not based off of ours,” said Cole-Avent, describing the challenge of defining “belonging” in a way that resonates with the nearly 30,000 people who are part of the UM community. “Having a common language and having an institutional direction outside of just the term ‘diversity’ really helps.”

While the language of “belonging” may be new to the University, efforts to increase diversity, integrity, responsibility, excellence, compassion, creativity, and teamwork (also known by the acronym DIRECCT) have been accelerating for the past two years as part of the UM Culture Transformation initiative. Workshops have already taught some 6,000 faculty and staff members ways to incorporate the DIRECCT values in everything they do. Beginning in January 2017, all newly hired employees will experience a revamped orientation program designed to send the message that regardless of your identity, your beliefs, your country of origin, or your job title, “We Are One U.”

Overseeing efforts to “build a better U” by changing the culture is Isaac Prilleltensky, dean of the School of Education and Human Development, who was appointed vice provost for institutional culture in February. As a preeminent community psychologist, he has dedicated his life and career to building healthy communities.

“Healthy communities make sure every single individual feels part of the community,” Prilleltensky explained. “All of us need to experience a sense of being appreciated, being recognized. This is a fundamental feeling in the human experience. We need it like oxygen.”

The second essential element of belonging, says Prilleltensky, is the opportunity to add value—“to life, to the University, to the community, to our families. People want to do the best they can. Our job is to create the conditions for excellence to emerge.”

As Prilleltensky has noted, there’s a tendency to dismiss as lip service such a broad, institution-wide call to action: “Just saying words doesn’t change the culture. I can recite the values and the common purpose, but at the end of the day we need skills and tools to help in that process.”

Some of the tools for leaders are available at umculture.miami.edu in the form of “action guides” to prompt discussions between supervisors and their employees. The focus is on three important questions: What does the culture transformation mean for us, how are we doing, and what can we do better?

Leading the culture transformation at the Miller School of Medicine is Stephen Symes, associate dean for diversity and multicultural affairs and faculty in the Division of Infectious Diseases. A renowned HIV/AIDS physician, Symes works with patients who face discrimination, lack of access to care, and other disparities as a result of their illness. Every day, Symes witnesses “the importance of having a workforce that can address health disparities and health equity.”

When Symes first joined the Miller School’s Office of Diversity and Multicultural Affairs in 2010, he primarily oversaw pipeline programs that fuel interest in medical careers among minority high school and college students. Beginning in June 2015, the office broadened its focus to include its own faculty and staff and form a contingent of people “who are diversity champions.” Now the office’s activities also include a SafeSpace program that “builds a network of allies” for LGBTQ students, human rights clinics through which medical students provide documentation that helps protect victims of human trafficking, and a 40-member Diversity Council that meets once a month to discuss concerns and policies.

“We’re making sure we have not only visible diversity, but more importantly inclusion,” Symes said. “People will give you more than a day’s work if they feel included—and less than a day’s work if they don’t. Inclusion is challenging to measure, but one day you look around and say, ‘Hey, this is a really great place to work!’”

Power to the Students

Students are very effective advocates for culture shifts at the U and beyond. According to Laura Kohn-Wood, chair of the Department of Educational and Psychological Studies in the School of Education and Human Development, there has been an uptick in student activism over the nearly eight years she has worked at the University.

“From the Haitian students’ demonstrations against policies in the Dominican Republic to the Black Lives Matter protests, I’ve seen a real increase in awareness and willingness to participate and make statements,” said Kohn-Wood, who co-chairs the UM Standing Committee on Diversity and Inclusion. “Maybe it’s due to social media and national events, but there’s a configuration of people who feel it’s not enough to go to college and get your degree and your good job; you have to also think about how you can make the world match your ideal.”

Offensive comments appearing on an anonymous social media platform following a 2014 Black Lives Matter student march sparked the creation of the Presidential Task Force for Addressing Black Students’ Concerns in the spring of 2015. It joined the Veteran Students Task Force, created in 2011, and the LGBTQ Task Force, created in 2013, as the first campus initiatives to improve the experiences of specific student identity groups.

These task forces became the foundation for the Standing Committee for Diversity and Inclusion, created in January 2016 as “a place where students who don’t necessarily have a voice on campus can go,” explained Ivann Anderson, a senior biology major who serves with Kohn-Wood as co-chair of the standing committee. Previously he served on the Black Student Concerns task force, was secretary of United Black Students, and was the Student Government speaker pro tempore.

Gender, country of origin, religion, and socioeconomic status are a few of the other student-led working groups being developed to join the standing committee, which reports to Executive Vice President and Provost Thomas J. LeBlanc. Working groups meet regularly with faculty, deans, and administrators to “push the envelope in terms of what student priorities are,” Kohn-Wood said.

The standing committee also has recommended “intersectionality” as a working group, charged with breaking down silos between identities. According to Van Bailey, inaugural director of the University’s LGBTQ Student Center and a national leader in identity-based student affairs work, pursuing intersectional dialogue not only helps build respect among different groups, but also helps students embrace themselves.

“The Culture of Belonging really highlights that students show up as their full selves, that it’s not fragmented, and that they don’t have to pick and choose when deciding which programs and services best represent who they are,” said Bailey, who was the inaugural director of BGLTQ Student Life at Harvard College. “I would go to black student celebrations, international student events, RAZA (Latino) celebrations—I was always about queering spaces, even if it meant I was just showing up. My agenda was never to infiltrate or take over those spaces but to show that LGBTQ people are everywhere and everything.”

Creating Safe, Inclusive Spaces

“The thing that led us the most,” Cole-Avent said about the Culture of Belonging Working Group, “was communication. True belonging means you’re part of the conversation. It’s validation that your voice is being heard; it’s creating spaces for people to talk.”

Whether it’s giving employees a chance to weigh in on human resources policies or giving students a seat at the campus planning table, engaging all UM voices in respectful discourse is fundamental.

“That’s what a campus is about,” said Cole-Avent. “It’s supposed to be an open environment to say, ‘This is what I think, and you think differently, so let’s have a conversation.’”

All across the University, changes in both physical spaces and day-to-day operations are nurturing meaningful conversations. Multicultural Student Affairs (MSA) is moving from the Rhodes House to the heart of campus in the Whitten University Center (UC) and is now reporting to Student Affairs. The shift will increase visibility on campus and provide more resources for interactive, cross-cultural programming. Renovations in the UC are adding couches and seating configurations conducive to dialogue in the MSA offices as well as in the new LGBTQ Student Center.

While the LGBTQ community has championed the “safe space” concept, feeling safe is a universal need. The creation of an Ablution Room in the UC for Muslim students to perform cleansing rituals before prayers, the newly renovated Braman Miller Center for Jewish Student Life, the designation of gender-neutral and inclusive restrooms on all campuses, and gender-inclusive housing options are all examples of the University’s intentional creation of physical spaces that promote interaction and ensure safety and comfort.

“Feeling undervalued, or feeling ignored, or feeling invisible has dire personal and social consequences,” said Prilleltensky, “because we cause harm to that individual and we lose out on that individual’s opportunity to improve the University.”

 

Posted in NewsComments Off

Dangerous Assignments: How Mexican Journalist Stay Alive

MexicanJournalismBy Barbara Gutierrez
UM News

Her body was found on the side of a roadway on February 9, 2016—hands and feet bound and a plastic bag over her head.

Only two days earlier, Anabel Flores Salazar, mother of two, had been snatched from her home in the state of Veracruz, Mexico, by armed assailants. Now she was dead. Murdered. And her story was a familiar one: A crime-beat reporter for the newspaper El Sol de Orizaba, Salazar had suffered the same fate of scores of Mexican journalists killed over the past few years for covering news about crime, corruption, and drug cartels in their country.

How has an almost-certain death sentence for simply reporting the truth affected the way Mexican journalists practice their craft?

That is at the heart of a first-of-its-kind study by a University of Miami scholar and research partners in Mexico who spent nearly three years studying the problem.

 

In Mexico, 81 journalists were murdered and 18 disappeared between 2000 and 2014, according to the Mexico City office of the London-based free expression advocate Article 19, with the numbers continuing to increase. Article 19 has also reported that 2016 has been one of the deadliest years for journalists on record. In recent years, media headquarters have been attacked with grenades or gunfire with widespread impunity.

Sallie Hughes, an associate professor in UM’s School of Communication, and her colleagues Mireya Marquéz-Ramírez of the Iberoamerican University in Mexico City and Marco Lara Klahr of the Media and Violence Program of the non-profit Instituto de Justicia Procesal Penal in Mexico City, surveyed nearly 380 Mexican journalists, asking them to report on the types of measures they use to reduce the risk of reprisals and direct threats carried out against them for covering certain types of news stories.

Among their findings: Nearly 68 percent of the journalists surveyed had practiced self-censorship, more than 64 percent abandon street reporting, and over 57 percent adhere to their media organization’s censorship policies. Half (50.3 percent) of the Mexican journalists surveyed reported hiding sensitive information from “suspicious people or untrustworthy colleagues in their own newsrooms,” according to the study.

The study was presented at the UNESCO Conference on Journalist Safety last May in Helsinki, Finland, at the United Nations’ World Press Freedom Day ceremonies, and will appear in a UNESCO book on journalist safety expected next year.

In Mexico, 81 journalists were murdered and 18 disappeared between 2000 and 2014, according to the Mexico City office of the London-based free expression advocate Article 19, with the numbers continuing to increase. Article 19 has also reported that 2016 has been one of the deadliest years for journalists on record. In recent years, media headquarters have been attacked with grenades or gunfire with widespread impunity.

“I have always been impressed and humbled by journalists in Mexico and Latin America and the conditions they work in,” said Hughes, author of Newsrooms in Conflict: Journalism and the Democratization of Mexico. “It’s a vocation, a passion for many of these journalists, but at some point the violence and threats become too much.”

For Marcos Hernández Bautista, his sensitive reporting in Oaxaca that included covering “cacicazgos,” local strongmen who rule parts of the region, came at a high price. The 38-year-old reporter for the daily Noticias, Voz e Imagen de Oaxaca was fatally shot as he climbed into his car last January. His friends told police that he often lived in fear.

The collaborative study by Hughes, Marquéz-Ramírez and Lara Klahr also found that some Mexican journalists, in an attempt to avoid the same fate suffered by Hernández Bautista, publish stories important for their communities anonymously on social media platforms, hoping they will not be tracked down.

Others in states such as Veracruz and Guerrero—two of the worst regions in Mexico because of the prevalence of violent drug cartels and hardline local politicians—report the news by sticking to what official police reports say. And in some instances, journalists do not publish anything at all, according to the study.

Aside from anti-press violence, economic pressures also force journalists to silence critical stories and voices. Journalists who support norms of using their profession to promote social change for the public good feel the pressures the most, according to the study.

Marquéz-Ramírez said the study could spur other researchers to conduct their own investigations and help Mexican journalists determine what changes they need to make to their profession.

“It can help policymakers and civil society organizations to better understand complex phenomena such as the decline of free press and the vulnerability of journalists in some areas,” said Marquéz-Ramírez, who coordinates Programa PRENDE in the Department of Communications at Universidad Iberoamericana Mexico City, an initiative in which local journalists attend a semester of studies in their field. “The general public can have a glimpse into the other side of media content and the world of journalists in Mexico. These are people who face a great deal of pressure and difficulty on a daily basis.”

Mexico is not the only country where journalists are deliberately targeted. So far in 2016, 17 journalists have been murdered worldwide, but many of those killings, points out Hughes, occurred in war-torn countries such as Iraq and Syria. Mexico and some other countries in Latin America, notably Honduras, Brazil and Colombia, stand out, she said, because they are democracies and have a free press that struggles to work autonomously while facing high levels of threat and risk. While the situation has improved somewhat for journalists in Colombia, the danger in Mexico continues unabated. And those who murder journalists in Mexico seem to carry out their deeds with absolute impunity, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists in New York.

Hughes, Marquéz-Ramírez, and Lara Klahr’s collaborative research study took almost three years to conduct, with interviews being conducted in person and via Skype. The researchers compiled a 1200-plus directory of media outlets from across the country and drew a stratified random sample of 130 media outlets. From there 377 journalists were selected systematically and interviewed.

Winning the trust of the journalists took time, but once the study was explained very few declined to participate, said Hughes.

Read this story in Spanish.

Posted in NewsComments Off

UM Focuses Medical Might on Zika

By Robert S. Benchley
Special to UM News

Mario Stevenson

Mario Stevenson

Mosquito-borne transmission of the Zika virus appeared in South Florida just recently, but at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, forward-thinking researchers and clinicians began preparing for its arrival a year ago.

That’s when David Watkins, Ph.D., Vice Chair for Research in the Department of Pathology, who researches diseases in Latin America where the infections were reaching epidemic proportions, first sounded the alarm about the potential consequences in South Florida.

He was correct to be concerned. There are now 42 confirmed locally acquired infections, including the first case just documented in Pinellas County, on Florida’s west coast.

Watkins’ colleagues heeded his call months before the World Health Organization declared Zika an international public health emergency, and before experts confirmed the virus was responsible for the surging number of newborns with abnormally small heads. They stopped thinking of Zika as a potential travel risk and began preparing to battle a possible outbreak here at home.

As a result, UHealth physicians are already busy counseling prospective parents and treating pregnant women, and UM scientists are working overtime to bring diagnostic and therapeutic responses from the laboratory to the clinic — some possibly by the end of this year.

Testing for the threat
One of them is Mario Stevenson, Ph.D., professor of medicine, Chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases and Director of the Institute of AIDS and Emerging Infectious Diseases, whose laboratory has developed a diagnostic blood test for Zika that costs a fraction of current tests, delivers results quickly, and can be performed on the spot in any hospital or outpatient clinic.

Right now the seven currently approved tests cost $100 to $150, have to be evaluated in a commercial laboratory, and require a wait of several days before a patient receives the results.

“That’s far too expensive for a couple in a developing country who want to have children — especially if they require multiple testing — and far too long for them to wait to learn if one of them is carrying the virus, which experts now know can be transmitted through sex,” said Stevenson. “Even here in Florida, where the Department of Health is offering free testing, the growing demand is putting a real time strain on the few laboratories that do the work.”

Zika was first isolated in 1947 and long considered benign and confined to Africa; its name comes from the Zika Forest in Uganda, where it was discovered.

Stevenson’s extremely sensitive test, which can detect the DNA of the Zika virus at the earliest stage of infection, would cost about one-tenth of current tests, with results ready in an hour. An investor is already waiting to market the test, and the only remaining hurdle is the application for FDA approval.

A video of Stevenson talking about Zika virus research is available here.

Watkins and two researchers from the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology — Sylvia Daunert, Pharm.D., M.S., Ph.D., professor and holder of the Lucille P. Markey Chair, and Sapna Deo, Ph.D., M.S., associate professor, and their team — have developed an even simpler, cheaper test. Potentially priced as low as $2, it requires no processing from a lab. Using a paper strip containing selective antibodies from the Watkins lab that bind to the virus obtained from Zika-infected patients, it delivers a simple “yes” or “no” verdict as to whether the virus is present, or whether the patient has ever been exposed to it.

“It’s completely simple,” said Daunert. “It can be used either in a physician’s office or by health care workers in remote rural locations where there are no hospitals or clinics. But in the process we are also developing a platform that can be customized for different viruses — it’s not just for Zika — because different ones are going to keep popping up.”

After completing the test development, which is still several months away, Watkins and Daunert will apply for a patent and begin seeking investors to bring it to market.

Preventing a pandemic
Watkins, working with Miller School colleague Ronald C. Desrosiers, Ph.D., professor of pathology, and investigators at the University of São Paulo, Brazil, and the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif., is also taking a preventive approach using antibodies from Zika patients.

“We could inject the antibodies into a woman prior to pregnancy to protect both the mother and the fetus,” he said, “or it could be done after infection, when it would bind to the virus and reduce replication.”

Still, he said, “therapeutic antibodies need to go through Phase I and Phase II trials, which will take one or two years. It’s not a quick fix.”

Another Miller School researcher is taking a classic vaccine approach, with a novel twist.

“Rather than using an attenuated live virus for vaccinations — an approach used for decades with other diseases, but which carries some risk — a Zika vaccine would incorporate only certain components of the virus, specifically the envelope portion, for patient safety,” said Glen N. Barber, Ph.D., chair of the Department of Cell Biology. “We are also looking at the mechanisms of how Zika overcomes the immune system to infect the host.”

Barber, however, believes developing the vaccine won’t be the hardest part of the task.

“I think it will be relatively easy to develop a vaccine,” he said, “and the animal studies will be completed this year. What will be more difficult will be determining how to scale up for vaccinating the population at large.”

Physicians on the front lines
In UM’s clinics, where UHealth physicians are on the front lines in the fight against Zika, obstetricians and gynecologists have been caring for pregnant women who were infected with Zika both abroad and at home. Now they are gearing up to expand their services.

“We are beginning a wrap-around neonatal and pediatric care clinic for women who have been infected with Zika during their pregnancies to ensure that during pregnancy and after delivery mothers and infants receive the care that they need,” said Christine L. Curry, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology, who over the months has had many conversations “with men, pregnant women and non-pregnant women about mosquito-bite prevention and prevention of sexual transmission.

“They’ve heard about it on the news and are asking what they can do to prevent Zika infection, either during pregnancy or before pregnancy,” she said. “If women are pregnant and living in Miami, we want them to avoid, if feasible, the areas where we know mosquito-borne Zika virus transmission is ongoing, so currently that’s Wynwood and parts of Miami Beach. In addition, no matter where they live or work in the city, we want them to wear mosquito repellant every time they leave the house, long pants and long sleeves, and do their best to remove all the standing water in their neighborhood. For both the partners and the patients, the exact same advice holds.”

Curry notes that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that women delay conception for two months from the time of a known or suspected Zika infection, and that men wait at least six months.

As such, she encourages women who are pregnant to be tested for Zika, and those who are planning a pregnancy to consult with their primary care provider. She recommends anyone who is experiencing Zika symptoms — fever, joint pain, muscle pain, red eyes or a rash — be evaluated by their primary care provider or at the emergency room.

A video of Curry talking about the Zika virus is available here.

Gearing up for the Zika virus on the clinical side has required many meetings and phone conferences within and among leaders of UHealth, Jackson Memorial Hospital and the VA Medical Center. Thomas M. Hooton, M.D., professor of clinical medicine and Medical Director of UHealth Infection Control, says dealing with all potentially large-scale public health threats ultimately comes down to two elements — education and communication.

“In the case of Zika virus, we must first educate our physicians and employees about how to keep themselves safe — personal protection and environmental issues — so they can be protected,” he said. “That includes our employees who work outdoors, and we have been providing special guidance to them.

“Then, on the clinical side, we also need to educate all clinicians and staff about how to identify, counsel and treat patients who may have Zika based on their symptoms or travel history. We also need to educate our patients to heighten their awareness about Zika and to encourage them to let their provider know of any concerns or questions they may have.”

Other concerns, which have received little media attention, he notes, include the blood supply, organ donation and in vitro fertilization.

“These are the issues that keep us talking to one another,” Hooton said. “Continued education and communication, until long-term solutions can emerge from the lab, are critical in keeping the Zika threat under control.”

Talking to the kids
Communication and education are also essential for parents and school officials who, in the face of the Zika threat, may be dealing with more than the normal back-to-school anxieties. Jill Ehrenreich-May, associate professor of psychology in the College of Arts and Sciences, says that even in the face of perceived danger, such as having a pregnant mom who needs to stay indoors, parents should reassure their children that the adults have everything covered.

“If a parent responds to the threat of Zika by hiding in the house and worrying about every puddle of water on the ground, the impact is probably going to feel bigger, more intense, and more problematic to both the parent and child,” she said. “If the threat isn’t acute to you or your family, it is important to be mindful that you as a parent are not accidentally reinforcing unnecessary avoidance behavior.”

The economic impact
Local and state officials are understandably jittery over the potential impact the locally transmitted outbreak could have on Miami-Dade County’s $36 billion tourism industry, and beyond.

Arun Sharma, Ph.D., professor of marketing at the UM School of Business Administration, expects it to be minimal since the greatest risk is to pregnant women, or those expecting to get pregnant. For now, the CDC is advising pregnant women and those planning a pregnancy to avoid Miami-Dade County altogether, so, Sharma said, “most tourists shrugged off the possible effects of Zika.”

But new concerns about Zika are being raised almost on a daily basis. CDC Director Tom Frieden noted that aerial spraying cannot be conducted amid high rises and sea breezes, so fighting Zika on Miami Beach will be more challenging than in Wynwood. A recent medical research report based on experiments on mice suggests that Zika may also affect adult brain cells critical to learning and memory.

And, if the outbreak grows, news about Zika on South Florida’s most popular tourist destination will continue to be broadcast across the country and around the world.

“So, what are the expectations for tourism and the local economy?” Sharma asked. “In the short-term it should be minimal. However, if the negative coverage of Zika in Miami increases and/or if countries start providing travel advisories suggesting that their citizens not visit Miami, the drop in tourism may be steep, negatively affecting the economy. The concern is not the young, who will continue coming. The concern is the middle-aged and older tourists who typically are more sensitive to health issues and may avoid Miami.”

But for Curry and other public health specialists, the Zika virus must be everybody’s concern and responsibility.

“While there is a focus on prevention of Zika in pregnancy, it’s the responsibility of every one of us to wear our bug spray, to wear our long sleeves and long pants, and to remove standing water because we cannot protect the pregnant women in our community if we are not all doing our part,” Curry said.

Posted in NewsComments Off

Elections Course Brings ‘Living History’ to Students

As the first guest speaker, U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen urged the class to register for the Nov. 8 election

 By Barbara Gutierrez
UM News

2016ElectionCourse

From left, Professor Casey Klofstad, U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtien, and pollster Fernand Amandi throw up the U at the first session of the 2016 Election Course.

CORAL GABLES, Fla. (August 24, 2016)—As an aspiring journalist, UM senior Margot Woll signed up for the 2016 Election Course because she feels she should know more about the upcoming presidential election. But her mind is made up; she will vote for Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Rachel Barrales, a senior from California, wants to know what the candidates’ views are on the economy and education. And Nathan Seidle, a 19-year-old sophomore and supporter of the Republican nominee, Donald Trump, was lured to the course hosted by the College of Arts and Sciences’ Department of Political Science because it is only offered once every four years.

About 270 students signed up for the course, which held at Storer Auditorium on Tuesday nights combines lectures with talks by prominent guest speakers. U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen was Tuesday night’s lead-off speaker and students welcomed the longtime Republican congresswoman with loud applause. She urged the students to vote.

“Thank goodness we live in a country where we can elect our leaders,” said Ros-Lehtinen. “It hurts me to say that I cannot vote for my party’s leader. I cannot vote for him, I would not be able to sleep at night.”

Instead of supporting Trump, Ros-Lehtinen plans to write in the name of former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, the son and brother of two former Republican presidents. Ros-Lehtinen spent half an hour talking about her experience in Congress where she has served for the past 27 years, and took pictures with some of her interns who are UM students, as well as many others who lined up to talk to her.

Political Science Professor Joseph Uscinski, who is one of the four teachers of the course, was not surprised by the enthusiasm in the room.

“Students watch what is going on in the news and all they hear is a lot of nastiness,” said Uscinski. “They are millennials who want to understand fully what is going on.”

UM instructor Fernand Amandi, managing partner of Bendixen & Amandi International, was in charge of the evening’s class, which was a mixture of lecture, stand-up comedy, and instant polling. Using clickers or classroom response devices, students answered questions posed on an overhead projector. The instant poll showed that 50 percent of the class would vote for Clinton, 17 percent for Trump, and the rest would either support the libertarian ticket or are undecided.

“You are all very fortunate to be in Florida and Miami-Dade County,” Amandi told the class. ”You are living history and it is very possible that Miami-Dade could decide the presidential election.”

Amandi spoke about the importance of Florida as a “swing state” in the presidential election. Using TV news clips from most of the major television stations, rock music, and animated videos, he also gave an overview of the U.S. president’s duties and role in a democratic society, the roles of Congress and the judicial branch of the government, and the many variables that can affect the outcome of the November election.

He showed a slide depicting all the available polls, which put Clinton in the lead.

“If the election were held today, Hillary Clinton would win but there are 77 days until Election Day,” Amandi said. “A lot can happen between now and then.”

Other instructors for the class are Professor Casey Klofstad of the Political Science Department and Rudy Fernandez, chief of staff to UM President Julio Frenk and vice president of government and community relations at UM.

 

Posted in NewsComments Off

  • Features
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe to the Veritas RSS Feed
    Get updates to all of the latest Veritas posts by clicking the logo at the right.

    You can also subscribe to specific categories by browsing to a particular section on our site and clicking the RSS icon below each section's header.

UM Facebook

UM Twitter