Study on mahi-mahi embryos and larvae shows toxic oil affects developing heart, eye, and neurological function
Special to UM News
This info graphic from the University of California, Riverside shows hexagonal shaped Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in crude oil impairs development of the heart, eye, and neurological function in the early life stages of mahi-mahi.
MIAMI (July 12, 2016)—A research team led by scientists at the University of California, Riverside, and the University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science has found that ultraviolet light is changing the structure of the oil components from the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill into something more toxic, further threatening numerous commercially and ecologically important fishes. The 2010 DWH explosion, which spilled more than 3 million barrels of crude oil into the northern Gulf of Mexico, is the worst oil disaster in U.S. history, contaminating the spawning habitats for many fishes.
“Ours is the first experiment evaluating the effects of DWH oil on the genetic responses of mahi-mahi embryos and larvae,” said Daniel Schlenk, a professor of aquatic ecotoxicology at UC Riverside, who led the study published in Environmental Science and Technology. “It is also the first experiment of this nature on a lifestage and species that was likely exposed to the oil. We found that the weathering of oil had more significant changes in gene expression related to critical functions in the embryos and larvae than the un-weathered oil. Our results predict that there are multiple targets of oil for toxicity to this species at the embryonic life stage.”
For their study, the researchers exposed the fish embryos to the oils at three different time points: 24 hours post fertilization, 48 hours post fertilization, and 96 hours post fertilization. (Hatching to larvae in mahi-mahi occurs at 48 hours post fertilization; the researchers bracketed this time point at 24 hours post fertilization and 96 hours post fertilization.) Then, the researchers collected transcripts of all the genetic information at each time point and evaluated these transcripts using novel bioinformatic methods. Finally, they evaluated the toxicity and heart functions in animals using the embryos’ gene expression to predict biochemical, cellular, and tissue targets where the oil was causing an effect.
For their experiments, Schlenk and Rosenstiel School scientists caught the mahi-mahi off the coast of Miami, and exposed embryos to two types of oil: one set was exposed to slick oil (weathered) from the spill, while another set was exposed to oil that came from the source of the spill. The researchers carried out the experiment this way because fish in the northern Gulf of Mexico had been exposed during the spill to both types of oil. The study attempted to understand which of the two oils—slick oil or source oil—is worse for the fish and how oil affects development.
“This study exemplifies a fruitful collaboration between UC Riverside and the UM Rosenstiel School to identify molecular targets for oil toxicity,” said Rosenstiel School Professor Martin Grosell, lead of the RECOVER (the Relationship of Effects of Cardiac Outcomes in Fish for Validation of Ecological Risk) consortium and co-author of the study. “In addition to impacts on heart development and function, the gene expression results illustrate the peripheral components of the nervous system involved in sensory function are impaired by oil exposure during early development.”
Sensory function is important for prey detection and predator avoidance.
“We found that the heart, eye, and neurological function were affected,” Schlenk said. “In collaboration with other consortia members from the Universities of Miami, Texas, and North Texas, we are now following up on these results. Previous studies have shown that the heart is the primary target for oil. Our study shows that in addition to heart function, risk and recovery should also examine eye and neuronal function.”
The approximately four-month study was expedited by a unique software, On-RAMP, that the researchers used to identify the gene signatures from the fish.
“Normally, it can take months to annotate the genes and identify the regulatory directions of expression,” Schlenk explained. “But by using On-RAMP, we could identify the genomic responses in a matter of weeks, allowing pathway analyses with sophisticated software normally only used for human/mice responses.”
The research was funded by the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative, Grant No: SA-1520, as well as the Relationship of Effects of Cardiac Outcomes in Fish for Validation of Ecological Risk (RECOVER) consortium.
In addition to Schlenk and Grosell, other co-authors of the study include Elvis Genbo Xu, Graciel Diamante, and Juliane Freitas, from UC Riverside; Edward M. Mager, Christina Pasparakis, Lela S. Schlenker, John D. Stieglitz, and Daniel Benetti from the UM Rosenstiel School; and E. Starr Hazard, Sean M. Courtney, and Gary Hardiman at the Medical University of South Carolina.
Next, the research team will follow up with whole animal physiological and behavioral effects to see if the newly identified molecular responses can be linked to function.
Watch a video of the fish larvae at 48 hours.